In Re Livan Otero Rodriguez v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed March 14, 2024
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-24-00050-CR
    __________
    IN RE LIVAN OTERO RODRIGUEZ
    Original Proceeding
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Relator, Livan Otero Rodriguez, has filed this original proceeding pro se
    seeking relief against the Ector County District Attorney’s Office (Respondent).
    According to Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, he was indicted by an Ector
    County grand jury for various offenses on July 13, 2015, and November 6, 2017.
    Relator requests this court “to order the District Attorney’s Office of Ector County,
    Texas to disclose” or produce “the Grand Jury panel composition and sequence of
    the Indictments.”
    To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must establish that: (1) the act
    sought to be compelled is a ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial
    decision; and (2) there is no adequate remedy at law to redress the alleged harm. In
    re Meza, 
    611 S.W.3d 383
    , 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 2020) (orig. proceeding).
    This court’s authority to exercise original jurisdiction is limited. See TEX.
    CONST. art. V, §§ 5, 6 (intermediate courts of appeals only have original jurisdiction
    as prescribed by law); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2023) (limited
    writ powers granted to courts of appeals). We do not have writ jurisdiction over a
    district attorney’s office unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction in another
    proceeding. GOV’T CODE § 22.221.
    Relator has not demonstrated that our jurisdiction is implicated here, or that
    the Ector County District Attorney’s Office is a party against whom we may issue a
    writ under the circumstances. Because Relator’s requested relief does not involve
    matters that are necessary to enforce our own jurisdiction, we do not have mandamus
    jurisdiction over the District Attorney’s Office in this proceeding. As a result, we
    have no jurisdiction as an intermediate appellate court to address this original
    proceeding. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    W. BRUCE WILLIAMS
    JUSTICE
    March 14, 2024
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
    Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-24-00050-CR

Filed Date: 3/14/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/16/2024