Virley-Leroy Session v. Riata Land Association Homeowners, Inc. ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-22-00562-CV
    Virley-Leroy SESSION,
    Appellant
    v.
    RIATA LAND ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNERS, INC.,
    Appellee
    From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 21-2100-CV-E
    Honorable Heather H. Wright, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
    Irene Rios Justice
    Beth Watkins, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: February 21, 2024
    DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
    Appellant’s brief was originally due on October 6, 2023. However, neither the brief nor a
    motion for extension of time was filed.          Instead, on October 10, 2023, appellant filed a
    “Jurisdictional Challenge,” which did not comply with the briefing requirements in Texas Rules
    of Appellate Procedure 9.4 or 38.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4, 38.1. We therefore ordered appellant
    to file by November 6, 2023, his brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to
    timely file a brief and why appellee was not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely
    file a brief.
    04-22-00562-CV
    On November 6, 2023, appellant filed a “Petition for a Writ of Mandamus,” which we
    construed as his appellant’s brief.    The filing, however, did not comply with the briefing
    requirements in Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.1(c), (g), (h), (i), and (k). See TEX. R. APP.
    P. 38.1. We therefore ordered appellant’s brief stricken and ordered appellant to file an amended
    brief by December 5, 2023.
    Appellant did not file an amended brief, and on December 18, 2023, we ordered appellant
    to file, by January 2, 2024, his amended brief and a written response reasonably explaining his
    failure to timely file an amended brief. In our order, we cautioned appellant if he failed to timely
    file an amended brief and written response, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also id. R. 42.3(c). Appellant did not respond to our order.
    Accordingly, because appellant has failed to comply with our order by filing an amended brief, we
    dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also id. R. 42.3(c).
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-22-00562-CV

Filed Date: 2/21/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/27/2024