Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters, a Texas Corporation v. Guadalupe Castro, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                          In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-24-00121-CV
    ___________________________
    TEXAS FARM BUREAU UNDERWRITERS, A TEXAS CORPORATION,
    Appellant
    V.
    GUADALUPE CASTRO, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
    SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 342nd District Court
    Tarrant County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 342-335023-22
    Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters, a Texas Corporation, appealed the
    trial court’s interlocutory order granting a motion for class certification filed by
    Appellee Guadalupe Castro, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
    Situated. See 
    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014
    (a)(3). After the notice of
    appeal was filed, we received an order from the trial court vacating the order granting
    Appellee’s motion for class certification. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.5 (“While an appeal
    from an interlocutory order is pending, the trial court retains jurisdiction of the
    case and . . . may make further orders, including one dissolving the order complained
    of on appeal.”).
    “Appellate courts are prohibited from deciding moot controversies.” Nat’l
    Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Jones, 
    1 S.W.3d 83
    , 86 (Tex. 1999). A case becomes moot if a
    justiciable controversy ceases to exist at any stage of the legal proceedings, including
    the appeal. In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 
    166 S.W.3d 732
    , 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig.
    proceeding); Williams v. Lara, 
    52 S.W.3d 171
    , 184 (Tex. 2001).
    On March 21, 2024, we notified Appellant that its appeal appeared to be moot.
    We informed Appellant that unless it filed a response by April 1, 2024, showing
    grounds for continuing the appeal, we would dismiss it as moot. See Tex. R. App.
    P. 44.3. Appellant has not filed a response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as
    moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Alorica and Alorica, Inc. v. Jasso, No. 08-18-00158-
    CV, 
    2018 WL 6191488
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso Nov. 28, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.)
    2
    (dismissing appeal from interlocutory order as moot where trial court vacated
    interlocutory order while appeal was pending); Morris v. Madrigal, No. 13-15-00203-
    CV, 
    2015 WL 3637841
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg June 11, 2015,
    no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Because the trial court has vacated the order subject to appeal,
    we conclude that this appeal has been rendered moot.”).
    /s/ Dana Womack
    Dana Womack
    Justice
    Delivered: April 18, 2024
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-24-00121-CV

Filed Date: 4/18/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/22/2024