Michael L. Foglio v. Maria Luisa Sanchez Portilla and Rental Property Professionals ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                              NUMBER 13-23-00573-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    MICHAEL L. FOGLIO,                                                                      Appellant,
    v.
    MARIA LUISA SANCHEZ
    PORTILLA AND RENTAL
    PROPERTY PROFESSIONALS,                            Appellees.
    ____________________________________________________________
    ON APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3
    OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña
    Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras
    This cause is before the Court on its own motion. 1 On November 28, 2023,
    appellant filed a notice of appeal. On December 13, 2023, the Clerk of the Court requested
    1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket
    equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
    appellant to remit a $205.00 filing fee within ten days from the date of the notice. On
    December 14, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant the amended notice of
    appeal did not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e) and 25.1(d)(1).
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e), 25.1(d)(1). On January 24, 2024, the Clerk of the Court again
    notified appellant of the delinquent filing fee and defects in his notice of appeal.
    Furthermore, appellant was notified that if the defects on the notice of appeal were not
    corrected within ten days or if the payment was not submitted within ten days, the appeal
    would be dismissed. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).
    Appellant has not paid the filing fee, has failed to cure the defects in the notice of
    appeal, and has not otherwise responded to the notices from the Clerk of the Court
    requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is
    dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(c).
    DORI CONTRERAS
    Chief Justice
    Delivered and filed on the
    25th day of April, 2024.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-23-00573-CV

Filed Date: 4/25/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/27/2024