Michael Bryant Martinez v. Jasmine Rebecca Brown ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •              In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-23-00280-CV
    ___________________________
    MICHAEL BRYANT MARTINEZ, Appellant
    V.
    JASMINE REBECCA BROWN, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 325th District Court
    Tarrant County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 325-708018-21
    Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Michael Bryant Martinez, proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the trial
    court’s sanctions order that ordered him to pay $1,800 to Appellee Jasmine Rebecca
    Brown.1
    On August 29, 2023, we notified Martinez of our concern that we lack
    jurisdiction over this appeal because the sanctions order does not appear to be a final
    judgment or appealable interlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195, 200 (Tex. 2001) (holding that, generally, appeals may be taken only from
    final judgments or interlocutory orders authorized by statute); Sanchez v. Spiral Diner &
    Bakery, No. 02-22-00185-CV, 
    2022 WL 2753446
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
    July 14, 2022, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“A sanctions order that does not dispose of all
    parties and all issues is not an appealable order.”); Rohani v. Tastee Kreme #2 Inc.,
    No. 05-21-01161-CV, 
    2022 WL 632168
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 4, 2022, no
    pet.) (mem. op.) (“It is well-settled that an appeal may not be taken from an
    interlocutory discovery sanctions order.”).
    We informed Martinez that unless he or any party desiring to continue the
    appeal filed a response by September 8, 2023, showing grounds for continuing the
    appeal, we could dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.
    1
    From what we can glean from the sanctions order and Martinez’s notice of
    appeal, the sanctions order was entered due to Martinez’s failure to respond to
    discovery and/or to provide documents responsive to discovery requests.
    2
    Martinez has not filed a response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of
    jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Sanchez, 
    2022 WL 2753446
    , at *1;
    Rohani, 
    2022 WL 632168
    , at *1.
    Dana Womacki
    Dana Womack
    Justice
    Delivered: October 19, 2023
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-23-00280-CV

Filed Date: 10/19/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/23/2023