Lawrence Paul Davenport v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                       In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    __________________
    NO. 09-24-00058-CR
    __________________
    LAWRENCE PAUL DAVENPORT, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    __________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 435th District Court
    Montgomery County, Texas
    Trial Cause No. 20-02-02517-CR
    __________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    The trial court sentenced Lawrence Paul Davenport on October 10, 2023.
    Davenport did not file a motion for new trial within 30 days after the date in which
    the trial court imposed sentence. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a). Notice of appeal was
    due to be filed on November 9, 2023. Davenport’s time for filing a motion for
    extension of time to perfect his appeal expired on November 27, 2023. On December
    19, 2023, the District Clerk received and filed a pro se notice of appeal dated
    December 13, 2023. On February 21, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties
    1
    that the notice of appeal has been filed outside the time for which an extension of
    time may be granted for filing notice of appeal, and warned the parties that the appeal
    would be dismissed unless grounds were shown for continuing the appeal.
    Davenport, through his appointed appellate counsel, obtained additional time to
    respond to the Clerk’s notice, but Davenport did not file a response that identifies a
    valid basis for this Court to exercise appellate jurisdiction over his appeal.
    When a defendant appeals from a conviction in a criminal case, the time to
    file a notice of appeal runs from the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open
    court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). An appellate court may extend the time to file the
    notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal,
    the defendant files a notice of appeal in the trial court and files a motion for extension
    of time in the appellate court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Davenport failed to file a
    notice of appeal and a motion for an extension of time within the time permitted by
    the rule. See id.
    “Timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to
    hearing an appeal.” Castillo v. State, 
    369 S.W.3d 196
    , 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).
    “If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, the court of appeals has no option but to
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.” 
    Id.
     Davenport does not argue that he
    obtained an out-of-time appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals. We dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
    2
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    PER CURIAM
    Submitted on April 30, 2024
    Opinion Delivered May 1, 2024
    Do Not Publish
    Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-24-00058-CR

Filed Date: 5/1/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/3/2024