In Re Garda CL Southwest, Inc. v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                 NUMBER 13-24-00314-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    IN RE GARDA CL SOUTHWEST, INC.
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña1
    Relator Garda CL Southwest, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting
    that the trial court abused its discretion by denying relator’s motion to designate a
    responsible third party. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 33.004. By order
    previously issued in this original proceeding, we requested the real party in interest, Juan
    1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
    required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R.
    47.1 (“The court of appeals must hand down a written opinion that is as brief as practicable but that
    addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal.”); id. R. 47.4 (explaining the
    differences between opinions and memorandum opinions).
    Flores, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus, and such response has
    been duly filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. However, relator has now filed a
    motion to withdraw its petition for writ of mandamus on grounds that the underlying lawsuit
    settled in mediation on July 17, 2024. Relator asserts that there are no pending matters
    before the trial court and, therefore, its petition for mandamus is moot.
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,
    the response, and the motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that this matter should be
    dismissed. See In re Cont. Freighters, Inc., 
    646 S.W.3d 810
    , 813 (Tex. 2022) (orig.
    proceeding) (per curiam); Heckman v. Williamson Cnty., 
    369 S.W.3d 137
    , 162 (Tex.
    2012); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 
    166 S.W.3d 732
    , 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig.
    proceeding). Accordingly, we grant relator’s motion to dismiss, and we dismiss this
    original proceeding as moot.
    L. ARON PEÑA JR.
    Justice
    Delivered and filed on the
    19th day of July, 2024.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-24-00314-CV

Filed Date: 7/19/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/20/2024