In Re Samad Sefiane v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                        In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    __________________
    NO. 09-24-00234-CR
    __________________
    IN RE SAMAD SEFIANE
    __________________________________________________________________
    Original Proceeding
    Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas
    Trial Cause No. 17-27943
    __________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    In a petition asking this Court to issue a writ of mandamus, Samad Sefiane
    complains that Jamie Smith, the Jefferson County District Clerk, failed to timely file
    and transmit documents Sefiane filed with the District Clerk in Trial Cause Number
    17-27943 to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 52; see
    generally Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3. We dismiss the petition.
    1Relator was convicted of aggravated family violence assault in the Criminal
    District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, in Trial Cause Number 17-27943. See
    Sefiane v. State, No. 09-18-00216-CR, 
    2019 WL 2439490
     (Tex. App.—Beaumont
    June 12, 2019, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Even though
    Sefiane didn’t certify that he served a copy of his petition for mandamus on the
    1
    Intermediate courts of appeal do not have jurisdiction to command actions to
    be taken by a district clerk unless the party making the request shows that issuing a
    writ is necessary to enforce the appellate court’s jurisdiction over an appeal. See Tex.
    Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b). Sefiane did not do so here. Accordingly, we
    dismiss Sefiane’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.
    PETITION DISMISSED.
    PER CURIAM
    Submitted on July 23, 2024
    Opinion Delivered July 24, 2024
    Do Not Publish
    Before Johnson, Wright and Chambers, JJ.
    Respondent and the Real Party in Interest, we suspend that requirement under the
    circumstances to expedite resolving the complaints that he has raised in his petition.
    See Tex. R. App. P. 2 (Suspension of Rules); id. 9.5(a) (Service of All Documents
    Required).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-24-00234-CR

Filed Date: 7/24/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/26/2024