David Creel v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )

NO. 12-24-00108-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
DAVID CREEL, § APPEAL FROM THE 123RD
APPELLANT
§
V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
§
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3.
On April 24, 2024, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the notice of appeal
failed to contain the information specifically required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
9.1(a). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(a) (“If a party is represented by counsel, a document filed on that
party’s behalf must be signed by at least one of the party’s attorneys”). Appellant was informed
that failure to file a proper notice of appeal on or before May 24 would result in referral to the
Court for dismissal. The date for filing a proper notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has
not complied with the Court’s request. 1
1
Appellant has two companion cases pending before this Court in appellate cause numbers 12-24-00106-
CR and 12-24-00107-CR. Appellant filed amended notices of appeal in those two appeals that corrected the defect
Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.1(a), the appeal is
dismissed. See id.
Opinion delivered May 31, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
identified in this Court’s April 24 notice, but did not correct the defect in the notice of appeal for appellate cause
number 12-24-00108-CR.
2
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
MAY 31, 2024
NO. 12-24-00108-CR
DAVID CREEL,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
Appeal from the 123rd District Court
of Shelby County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 24CR22434)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,
it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be,
and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for
observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.