Global Energy Enterprises Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 8, 2024.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-23-00732-CV
    GLOBAL ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC., Appellant
    V.
    WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee
    On Appeal from the 125th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2021-18748
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed January 31, 2022. On
    February 10, 2022, appellant filed a post-judgment motion to vacate, set aside,
    cancel the judgment, and reopen the case. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed
    October 04, 2023. The notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the
    judgment is signed if any party timely files post-judgment motion. See Tex. R.
    App. P. 26.1.
    Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend time is
    necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal
    beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within
    the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time.
    See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617–18 (1997) (construing predecessor
    to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-day period
    provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.
    On December 6, 2023, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal
    was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of subject-matter
    jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On December 27, 2023, appellant’s chief
    executive officer responded to the dismissal letter. However, the response is not
    sufficient to establish how this court has jurisdiction1.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of subject-matter jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justice Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
    1
    In addition, the response was not filed by a lawyer. See Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v.
    Formosa Plastics Corp., USA., 
    937 S.W.2d 455
    , 456 (Tex. 1996) (“Generally a corporation may
    be represented only by a licensed attorney.”).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-23-00732-CV

Filed Date: 2/8/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/11/2024