Jose A. Villarreal Jr. v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-23-01110-CR
    Jose A. VILLARREAL Jr.,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2020CR3383
    Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Beth Watkins, Justice
    Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
    Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: February 7, 2024
    DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
    On December 18, 2023, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal that appeared to indicate
    he wished to challenge the “magistrate, pre-trial, and grand jury” proceedings in the underlying
    criminal case. The clerk’s record, which was filed on January 8, 2024, does not contain a judgment
    of conviction or other appealable order. Additionally, the district clerk has informed this court that
    appellant has not yet been tried or sentenced in this case.
    Generally, a criminal defendant may only appeal from a final judgment of conviction. See
    TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02; State v. Sellers, 
    790 S.W.2d 316
    , 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim.
    04-23-01110-CR
    App. 1990). Because no final judgment of conviction has been signed in this case, it appears the
    ruling, if any, appellant seeks to challenge is interlocutory. The courts of appeals lack jurisdiction
    to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. Ragston
    v. State, 
    424 S.W.3d 49
    , 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). For these reasons, on January 10, 2024, we
    ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of
    jurisdiction.
    On January 18, 2024, appellant’s appointed counsel filed a response to our order. Counsel
    represented that he had reviewed the record and “found no reason that this Court should not dismiss
    this appeal for want of jurisdiction.” He also represented that he had spoken with appellant, who
    “agreed that this Court does not have jurisdiction of this appeal[.]” Accordingly, we dismiss this
    appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-23-01110-CR

Filed Date: 2/7/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/13/2024