Razor Services, Inc. and Ovelio Quero v. Jared Pena ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                    COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    RAZOR SERVICES, INC and OVELIO                    §               No. 08-23-00252-CV
    QUERO,
    §                  Appeal from the
    Appellants,
    §           143rd Judicial District Court
    v.
    §             of Reeves County, Texas
    JARED PENA,
    §             (TC#21-10-24172-CVR)
    Appellee.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before this Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this appeal and render judgment
    effectuating the parties’ agreement pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and
    42.1(a)(2)(A). In the motion, the parties state that they reached a resolution of the matter through
    mediation and attach a Rule 11 Agreement indicating that they have agreed to execute a settlement
    agreement and exchange a settlement payment, thereby obviating the need for this appeal.
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 provides the actions a court may take to dispose
    of an appeal on the motion of the appellant or by agreement of the parties. On the motion of the
    appellant, a court may dismiss the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). When parties file an
    agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys, the court may: “(A) render judgment effectuating
    the parties’ agreement; (B) set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and
    remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement; or
    (C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement.” TEX.
    R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A)–(C).
    The parties have not filed a settlement agreement with the clerk as required by
    Rule 42.1(a)(1); thus, this Court is prevented from rendering a judgment effectuating an
    agreement. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1)(2). Instead, we invoke Rule 42.1(a)(2)(B) to accomplish the
    parties’ request in their motion. Treating the parties’ motion as seeking relief under Rule
    42.1(a)(2)(B), we grant the motion and hereby set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard
    to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with
    the parties’ agreement.
    LISA J. SOTO, Justice
    December 18, 2023
    Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-23-00252-CV

Filed Date: 12/18/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2023