Ted Parshall v. Medley Equipment Company ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    TED PARSHALL,                                      §               No. 08-24-00020-CV
    Appellant,          §                  Appeal from the
    v.                                                 §            109th Judicial District Court
    MEDLEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY,                          §             of Andrews County, Texas
    Appellee.           §                    (TC#21798)
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before this Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice. In the
    motion, the parties state that they have reached a settlement and Appellant no longer wishes to
    pursue this appeal.
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 provides the actions a court may take to dispose
    of an appeal on the motion of the appellant or by agreement of the parties. On the motion of
    appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order. Tex. R. App.
    P. 42.1(a)(1). When parties file an agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys, the court may:
    “(A) render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement; (B) set aside the trial court’s judgment
    without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in
    accordance with the agreement; or (C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court
    to effectuate the agreement.” Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A)–(C).
    The parties have not filed a copy of their settlement agreement with this Court’s clerk as
    required for a dismissal under Rule 42.1(a)(2). We therefore conclude that the motion seeks a
    voluntary dismissal by Appellant pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1)
    (providing for dismissal on appellant’s motion). The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed
    with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the party incurring the same as stated in the agreed motion.
    Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). All pending motions are denied as moot.
    GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
    October 28, 2024
    Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-24-00020-CV

Filed Date: 10/28/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2024