Charles Brewster, Individually and as Attorney-In-Fact for Arthur Brewster and Austin Brewster, of the Estate of Alma Jean Brewster v. Delbert Lynn Goss and Roy Lynn Lemley ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                         NO. 12-23-00324-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    CHARLES BREWSTER,                                         §   APPEAL FROM THE 4TH
    INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ATTORNEY-
    IN-FACT FOR ARTHUR BREWSTER
    AND AUSTIN BREWSTER,
    EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF
    ALMA JEAN BREWSTER,
    DECEASED,                                                 §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    APPELLANT
    V.
    DELBERT LYNN GOSS AND ROY
    LYNN LEMLEY,                                              §   RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS
    APPELLEES
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Appellant, Charles Brewster, individually and as attorney-in-fact for Arthur Brewster and
    Austin Brewster, executor of the Estate of Alma Jean Brewster, deceased, filed a joint motion to
    dismiss this appeal. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s
    joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
    Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.
    Opinion delivered October 9, 2024.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    OCTOBER 9, 2024
    NO. 12-23-00324-CV
    CHARLES BREWSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR
    ARTHUR BREWSTER AND AUSTIN BREWSTER, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF
    ALMA JEAN BREWSTER, DECEASED,
    Appellant
    V.
    DELBERT LYNN GOSS AND ROY LYNN LEMLEY,
    Appellees
    Appeal from the 4th District Court
    of Rusk County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2023-120)
    THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the joint motion of the Appellant to
    dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED
    and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed,
    and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are taxed against the
    party incurring same.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-23-00324-CV

Filed Date: 10/9/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/12/2024