In the Estate of Steven Andre Prue, Sr. v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                            NUMBER 13-24-00372-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    IN THE ESTATE OF STEVEN ANDRE PRUE SR., DECEASED
    ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2
    OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Silva
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva
    On July 29, 2024, appellant Christopher Jeffrey Prue filed a notice of appeal on an
    order rendered in the underlying probate proceeding, trial court cause number 2022-PR-
    00004-2. That same day, the Clerk of the Court requested appellant to remit a $205.00
    filing fee. On August 12, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant he was delinquent
    in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of the Court further notified appellant the appeal
    was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of the
    notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3 (b), (c).
    On September 23, 2024, we abated the matter for the trial court to determine
    appellant’s indigency status and whether appellant was entitled to proceed without the
    payment of fees. On October 10, 2024, the Honorable Rogelio Valdez held an indigency
    hearing. The trial court found that “he is not indigent, and he is able to pay.” On October
    22, 2024, the trial court signed an “Order on Indigency Request of Appellate Court.” On
    October 23, 2024, the case was reinstated, and on October 31, 2024, the Clerk of the
    Court sent a final notice to the appellant that he was delinquent in remitting a $205.00
    filing fee. The Clerk of the Court further notified appellant the appeal was subject to
    dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of the notice. See id.
    To date, the filing fee has not been paid.
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 permits an appellate court to dismiss the
    appeal for want of prosecution for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate
    rules. See id. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure
    to pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly,
    the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Id. Any pending motions are denied as
    moot.
    CLARISSA SILVA
    Justice
    Delivered and filed on the
    21st day of November, 2024.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-24-00372-CV

Filed Date: 11/21/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/23/2024