Gonzalez, Gonzalo Nuncio ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-92,798-01
    EX PARTE GONZALO NUNCIO GONZALEZ, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 2018-2123-C1A IN THE 19TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM MCLENNAN COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    OPINION
    Applicant pleaded guilty to one count of assault of a public servant and one count of
    possession of a controlled substance, and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment on each count,
    to run concurrently. He did not appeal his convictions. Applicant filed this application for a writ
    of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See
    TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
    Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because the State failed to disclose
    favorable evidence to the defense. Specifically, Applicant alleges that despite several requests, the
    State did not provide the defense with videos from the dash cams and body cams of the arresting
    officers. Applicant alleges that those videos, which were eventually provided to habeas counsel
    2
    pursuant to a public information request, contained information that would have been helpful to
    challenge the information contained in the police reports, to provide additional avenues for
    investigation, and to potentially negotiate a more favorable plea agreement. Applicant alleges that
    had the videos been provided to the defense when requested, he would not have pleaded guilty to
    assault of a public servant but would have insisted on going to trial on the charges.
    Based on the record, the trial court has determined that the State’s failure to provide the
    videos to the defense rendered Applicant’s plea unknowing and involuntary, and that had the videos
    been disclosed prior to trial, there is a reasonable probability that Applicant would not have pleaded
    guilty but would have exercised his right to a jury trial.
    Relief is granted. Brady v. Maryland, 
    373 U.S. 83
    , 87 (1963); Brady v. United States, 
    397 U.S. 742
     (1970). The judgment in cause number 2018-2123-C1 in the 19th District Court of
    McLennan County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of McLennan
    County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary
    bench warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.
    Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
    Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
    Delivered: April 27, 2022
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-92,798-01

Filed Date: 4/27/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/2/2022