Jones, James Douglas ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-59,823-07
    EX PARTE JAMES DOUGLAS JONES, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 2003-197D IN THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT
    FROM CALDWELL COUNTY
    Per curiam. ALCALA , J., would grant relief.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
    assault on a public servant and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of
    Appeals affirmed his conviction. Jones v. State, No. 03-08-00683-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 20,
    2009) (not designated for publication).
    In a supplemental ground, Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to properly investigate
    Applicant’s case and advise him of the law applicable to his case. The trial court made findings of
    fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we grant relief. We believe that the record should
    2
    be further developed.
    Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold
    a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to
    be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing.
    TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall determine whether the factual basis of Applicant’s supplemental ground
    was unavailable on the date Applicant filed a previously considered application. The trial court shall
    specifically determine whether the factual basis of Applicant’s supplemental ground was
    ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable diligence on or before the date Applicant filed a
    previously considered application. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 4(c). The trial court
    shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and
    appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
    be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: October 5, 2016
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-59,823-07

Filed Date: 10/5/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/10/2016