Green, Mark Allen ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-86,437-01
    EX PARTE MARK ALLEN GREEN, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. C34,826 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW
    FROM NAVARRO COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual
    abuse of a child and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed
    his conviction. Green v. State, No. 10-13-00131-CR (Tex. App.—Waco Jun. 26, 2014) (not
    designated for publication).
    Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
    did not timely notify Applicant that his pro se motions for rehearing had been denied. Alternatively,
    Applicant argues that he is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary
    2
    review due to a breakdown in the system. Ex parte Riley, 
    193 S.W.3d 900
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
    
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984); Ex parte Wilson, 
    956 S.W.2d 25
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). In these
    circumstances, additional facts are needed. Pursuant to Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
    shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on
    appeal. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s
    appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that motions for rehearing were denied. The trial court
    shall also make specific findings addressing Applicant’s claim that a breakdown in the system
    prevented him from pursuing discretionary review. The trial court shall also make any other findings
    of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s
    claim for habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
    be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
    3
    Filed: March 29, 2017
    Do not publish