Perez, Jazmin Rodriguez ( 2023 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-94,050-01
EX PARTE JAZMIN PEREZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 1062589-A IN THE 185TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to fifteen
years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of
conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
This application was file-stamped in Harris County on October 9, 2008. An order
designating issues was signed by the trial judge on October 17, 2008. This application was not
received by this Court until August 17, 2022. There is no indication in the record of any action by
the trial court after the order designating issues was signed. Nor is there any indication as to why
this application was pending in Harris County for so long without any action by the clerk or the trial
court.
Applicant contends that his trial counsel acted under a conflict of interest because each of the
three co-defendants in his situation were all represented by different members of a three person law
firm, Flood and Flood. He alleges that he was unaware of the situation and did not waive any
conflict. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474
U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record
should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM .
PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
As a preliminary matter, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to why no action was
taken by the trial court or the clerk between the entry of the order designating issues and the
forwarding of the application to this Court. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant
as to whether Applicant still wants to pursue this application, and shall include that response in the
supplemental record. If the trial court is unable to obtain such a response from Applicant, the trial
court shall detail the efforts that were made to obtain a response from Applicant. The trial court shall
then return the application to this Court..
If Applicant indicates that he does want to pursue this application, the trial court shall order
trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use any
means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the
trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: January 11, 2023
Do not publish