Deleon, Steven ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-86,765-01
    EX PARTE STEVEN DELEON, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 2012-166A IN THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT
    FROM CALDWELL COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual
    abuse of a child and sentenced to thirty-two years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals
    affirmed his conviction. DeLeon v. State, No. 03-13-00202-CR (Tex. App.—Austin May 29,
    2015)(not designated for publication).
    Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
    failed to present evidence that Applicant was not in Caldwell County on the dates alleged in the
    indictment and therefore, could not have committed the offense on these days. Applicant also
    2
    alleges that counsel failed to prepare testifying witnesses, including himself, and failed to call
    character witnesses.
    Following a hearing, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. However,
    the trial court’s original findings of fact and conclusions of law did not address all of Applicant’s
    allegations. Therefore, additional findings of fact are necessary in order to resolve the issues in this
    case.
    The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law as to (1)
    whether counsel was deficient in failing to present additional evidence as to Applicant’s alibi for
    June 18, 2011, July 2, 2011, and, July 30, 2011; (2) whether counsel adequately prepared Frank
    DeLeon, Christine DeLeon, and Lorraine DeLeon for their testimony; (3) whether counsel was
    deficient for failing to call Applicant’s ex-girlfriend to testify during punishment; and, (4) whether
    or not counsel adequately prepared Applicant for his testimony. The trial court shall also make any
    other supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to
    the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
    be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: December 13, 2017
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-86,765-01

Filed Date: 12/13/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/14/2017