Gallegos, Ex Parte Raul Jr. ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NOS. AP-76,661 & AP-76,662
    EX PARTE RAUL GALLEGOS JR., Applicant
    ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NOS. CR-08-67 & CR-08-69
    IN THE 216TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BANDERA COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    OPINION
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
    parte Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of
    manufacture and possession of methamphetamine. He was sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment
    for the possession charge and sixty years’ imprisonment for the manufacture charge, running
    concurrently. The Fourth Court of Appeals upheld his convictions. Gallegos. v. State, Nos. 04-08-
    00716-CR & 04-08-00718-CR (Tex. App.–San Antonio Feb. 10, 2010)(unpublished).
    Applicant contends, inter alia, that his convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the
    US Constitution. The indictments for each cause alleged the amount of methamphetamine as over
    400 grams. The trial court has found that there were three separate batches of drugs discovered at
    the crime scene in these cases, however only one of those amounts weighed over 400 grams as
    alleged in the indictments. Therefore the same drugs were used to convict Applicant of both the
    possession and the manufacture of a controlled substance charges. This is a violation of the Double
    Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution. Weinn v. State, 
    326 S.W.3d 189
    (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2010).
    Relief is granted. The remedy when a violation of the Double Jeopardy clause has occurred
    is to vacate the lesser sentence and retain the greater sentence. See Ex parte Cavazos, 203 S.W.3d
    333,337 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Therefore, the judgment in Cause No. CR-08-067 in the 216th
    Judicial District Court of Bandera County is vacated and set aside. All other challenges to the
    convictions in both of these cause numbers are denied based on this Court’s review of the record.
    Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
    Institutions Division and Parole Division.
    Delivered: October 12, 2011
    Do Not Publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-76,662

Filed Date: 10/12/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015