Thurman, Colby Ross ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-82,332-01
    EX PARTE COLBY ROSS THURMAN, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 12720 IN THE 118TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM HOWARD COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a
    controlled substance and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.
    Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied adequate notice that he would
    be considered for release on mandatory supervision by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles under
    the discretionary mandatory-supervision statute, TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 42.18, § 8(c).
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,
    2
    additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any
    means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If
    Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was afforded adequate
    notice that he would be considered for release on mandatory supervision by the Texas Board of
    Pardons and Paroles under the discretionary mandatory-supervision statute. Ex parte Retzlaff, 
    135 S.W.3d 45
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). If Applicant was provided with adequate notice, the trial court
    shall supplement the habeas record with copies of the notices provided to Applicant. The trial court
    shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and
    appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the
    order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be
    obtained from this Court.
    Filed: January 14, 2015
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-82,332-01

Filed Date: 1/14/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015