Jones, Larry Douglas ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-52,064-03
    EX PARTE LARRY DOUGLAS JONES, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 98-149-K368C IN THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual
    assault and indecency with a child and sentenced to imprisonment for life and twenty years,
    respectively. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Jones v. State, No. 03-98-00639-
    CR (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 2, 2000) (not designated for publication).
    Applicant contends, among other things, that the complainant’s testimony was coached and
    coerced. Applicant submitted a document purporting to be an affidavit from the complainant. The
    trial court found that this document was fraudulent and concluded that Applicant had abused the
    2
    writ.
    We find that Applicant has submitted false evidence. We dismiss his application and cite
    him for abuse of the writ. Applicant has waived and abandoned any contention that he might have
    in regard to his convictions, at least insofar as existing claims that he could have or should have
    brought in the application. Ex parte Jones, 
    97 S.W.3d 586
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Middaugh v.
    State, 
    683 S.W.2d 713
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); Ex parte Emmons, 
    660 S.W.2d 106
    (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1983). Additionally, based on Applicant’s submission of false evidence, we find that Applicant
    has filed a frivolous lawsuit.
    We instruct the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals not to accept the instant application
    for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application relating to these convictions unless Applicant
    shows in such an application that any claims presented have not been raised previously and that they
    could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton,
    
    602 S.W.2d 534
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).
    Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
    Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
    Filed: August 21, 2019
    Do not publish