McClellan, Kenneth Jaye ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-83,943-01
    EX PARTE KENNETH JAYE MCCLELLAN, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. C371-010555-1060758-A IN THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT
    FROM TARRANT COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to online solicitation
    of a minor and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment.
    Applicant contends, among other things,1 that the statute pursuant to which he was convicted,
    Subsection 33.021(c) of the Texas Penal Code, is unconstitutional on its face when read in
    conjunction with Subsection (d) of the statute as it existed at the time of Applicant’s offense.
    1
    This Court has considered Applicant’s other claims, and finds them to be without merit.
    2
    Applicant alleges that the two subsections read together render the statute both over-broad and vague
    in violation the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. We order that this application
    be filed and set for submission to determine first whether a facial challenge to the constitutionality
    of a statute which has not been previously held unconstitutional may be made for the first time in
    a post-conviction habeas application. If such a challenge is available for the first time by way of
    post-conviction habeas review, then it must be determined whether Subsections 33.021(c) and (d)
    of the Texas Penal Code, as they existed at the time of Applicant’s offense, are unconstitutionally
    over-broad and vague in violation of the First Amendment. The parties shall brief these issues.
    It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If that is not correct, the trial court shall
    determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and desires to be represented by
    counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art
    26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 30 days of the date of this order, a
    supplemental transcript containing: a confirmation that Applicant is represented by counsel; the
    order appointing counsel; or a statement that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with
    this Court on or before February 8, 2016.
    Filed: December 9, 2015
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-83,943-01

Filed Date: 12/9/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016