Sims, Dejuan ( 2017 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-86,116-01
EX PARTE DEJUAN SIMS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. W10-00789-S(A) IN THE 282ND DISTRICT COURT
FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam. A LCALA, J., dissenting.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a
habitation with intent to commit other felony and sentenced to twenty-three years’ imprisonment.
The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Sims v. State, No. 05-10-01312-CR (Tex.
App.—Dallas June 21, 2012)(not designated for publication).
Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel was
deficient for failing to investigate, interview, and call his brother, Jacky Sims, to testify. Applicant
2
alleges that Jacky was an eyewitness to the events and could have testified to the benefit of the
defense. Applicant also alleges that the State indicted Applicant three times, but counsel failed to
object to the indictments as improperly amended for failing to comply with Articles 28.10 and 28.11
of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The
trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and
conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
3
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: January 11, 2017
Do not publish