VALADEZ, ALVIN Jr. ( 2018 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-89,082-01
EX PARTE ALVIN VALADEZ JR. , Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 13-1568-CR-C-A IN THE 2ND 25TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM GUADALUPE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a
controlled substance and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Valadez v. State, No. 04-14-00626-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sep. 16, 2015) (not
designated for publication).
Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he pursued
an objectively unreasonable strategy and did not convey a plea offer.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
2
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to provide a supplemental response to Applicant’s claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.
It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,
it shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall make specific findings detailing how counsel
advised Applicant as to the viability of his trial strategy and any advice counsel gave Applicant with
respect to any plea offers. If the trial court finds that counsel erred in advising Applicant about any
plea offers or did not pass along any plea offers, the trial court shall also make findings addressing
whether there is a reasonable probability that: (1) he would have accepted the offer; (2) the
prosecution would not have withdrawn the offer; and (3) the trial court would not have refused to
accept the plea bargain. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of
law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus
relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
3
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: December 19, 2018
Do not publish