Cortez, Ex Parte Ray Recio ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. AP-76,144
    EX PARTE RAY RECIO CORTEZ, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. B-04-0897-S IN THE 119 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    OPINION
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to
    aggravated kidnapping, and was sentenced to eighty years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of
    Appeals affirmed his conviction. Cortez v. State, No. 03-05-00256-CR (Tex. App. – Austin, May
    30, 2007).
    Applicant contends, inter alia, that he was denied the opportunity to petition this Court for
    discretionary review, because he did not receive timely notice that his conviction had been affirmed
    2
    and that he had a right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Appellate counsel filed an
    affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court entered findings of fact and
    conclusions of law that appellate counsel sent timely notice to Applicant that his conviction had been
    affirmed, and advised him of his right to petition for discretionary appeal pro se. Because there was
    some evidence in the record to support Applicant’s claim that he did not timely receive this notice,
    we remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
    The trial court obtained an affidavit from TDCJ, which indicates that Applicant did not
    receive any mail from his attorney during the applicable period for filing his petition for discretionary
    review. Because it is possible that Applicant was deprived of his opportunity to petition for
    discretionary review due to a breakdown in the system, the trial court recommends that relief be
    granted. Ex parte Riley, 
    193 S.W.3d 900
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find, therefore, that Applicant
    is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment
    of the Third Court of Appeals in Cause No. 03-05-00256-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause
    No. B-04-0897-S from the 119th Judicial District Court of Tom Green County. Applicant shall file
    his petition for discretionary review with the Third Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on
    which this Court’s mandate issues.
    Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 
    943 S.W.2d 469
    (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1997).
    Delivered: April 29, 2009
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-76,144

Filed Date: 4/29/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/15/2015