Vance Edward Johnson, Relator v. Harris County District Clerk ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. AP-76,611
    VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, Relator
    v.
    HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    CAUSE NO. 1031454 IN THE 184TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    FROM HARRIS COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    A LCALA, J., not participating.
    OPINION
    Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
    jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
    in the 184th Judicial District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that
    the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.
    2
    On June 29, 2011, we held this application in abeyance and ordered the Respondent, the
    District Clerk of Harris County, to file a response. On August 1, we received a response. It included
    correspondence in which the State acknowledged receiving Relator’s application on March 26, 2010.
    The response also included a copy of the State’s proposed order designating issues, which the trial
    court signed on December 8, 2010.
    Under Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the State shall answer an application
    within 15 days of the date it receives a copy. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(b). If the trial
    court determines that there are controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of
    an applicant’s confinement, it shall enter an order within 20 days of the expiration of the time the
    State is permitted to answer. Art. 11.07, § 3(d). In Relator’s case, the trial court signed the State’s
    proposed order designating issues on December 8, 2010. This order was not timely entered. “Without
    a timely entry of an order designating issues, Article 11.07 imposes a duty upon the clerk of the trial
    court to immediately transmit to this Court the record from the application for a writ of habeas
    corpus, deeming the trial court’s inaction a finding that no issues of fact require further resolution.”
    Gibson v. Dallas County Dist. Clerk, 
    275 S.W.3d 491
    , 492 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009).
    We conditionally grant mandamus relief and direct the Respondent to immediately forward
    Relator’s application to this Court. The writ of mandamus will issue only in the event that the
    Respondent fails to comply.
    Filed: August 24, 2011
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-76,611

Filed Date: 8/24/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015