Esparza, Ex Parte Reynaldo Roberto ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. AP-76,839
    EX PARTE REYNALDO ROBERTO ESPARZA, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 2005CRN166-D3(A) IN THE 341ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    FROM WEBB COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    OPINION
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of
    murder, two counts of aggravated kidnapping, and two counts of engaging in organized criminal
    activity and was sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment.
    Applicant contends that he was denied the right to appeal his conviction because his trial
    counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. Although Applicant timely expressed his desire to
    appeal, trial counsel did not withdraw and appellate counsel was not appointed until after the
    appellate deadline had passed. Although appellate counsel filed a notice of appeal, Applicant’s
    appeal was dismissed as untimely. Esparza v. State, No. 04-05-00922-CR (Tex. App. – San
    Antonio, January 25, 2006).
    The habeas record indicates that trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal.
    Although counsel states in an affidavit that it was his understanding that Applicant’s family would
    retain appellate counsel, he did not move to withdraw from the representation until after the appellate
    deadline had passed, and he did not file a notice of appeal or a motion for a new trial. Ex parte Axel,
    
    757 S.W.2d 369
    , 374 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).
    We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal
    of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 2005CRN166-D3(A) from the 341st Judicial District
    Court of Webb County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written
    notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time
    limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of
    this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take
    affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate
    of this Court issues.
    Delivered: August 22, 2012
    Do Not Publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-76,839

Filed Date: 8/22/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015