BRAZ, JOHN ALLEN Jr. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-82,368-01
    EX PARTE JOHN ALLEN BRAZ, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 23420-422 IN THE 422ND DISTRICT COURT
    FROM KAUFMAN COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three counts of
    aggravated sexual assault. He was sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment for two of those counts
    and thirty-five years’ imprisonment for the other. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his
    conviction. Braz v. State, No. 05-06-00428-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas July 16, 2007)(not designated
    for publication).
    Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance at both the
    guilt/innocence and punishment phases of trial. He raises multiple allegations that are detailed in
    2
    the memorandum attached to his habeas application. An order designating issues was timely signed
    by the trial court on March 26, 2010. That order instructed trial counsel to submit an affidavit to
    respond to the allegations contained in Applicant’s habeas application. There is no indication that
    the affidavit has ever been filed with the trial court.
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
    
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 
    993 S.W.2d 114
    , 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
    circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
    shall again order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
    and shall obtain such a response. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM .
    PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
    performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
    performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and
    conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
    habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    3
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
    be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: November 26, 2014
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-82,368-01

Filed Date: 11/26/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015