Allen, Brandon Lee ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •               IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NOS. WR-82,318-01 AND WR-82,318-02
    EX PARTE BRANDON LEE ALLEN, Applicant
    ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NOS. C34887-CR AND C34888-CR
    IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW FROM NAVARRO COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
    parte Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to one charge
    of aggravated assault of a public servant and one charge of retaliation, and was sentenced to six
    years’ imprisonment for each charge, to run concurrently. He did not appeal his convictions.
    Applicant contends that his plea agreement was breached, and that his mental health issues
    were not considered or addressed. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief.
    In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 2
    294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The
    trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. Specifically, trial counsel shall
    state whether Applicant was ever advised that the granting of shock probation in these cases (as
    opposed to the opportunity to request shock probation) was part of the plea agreement in these cases.
    Trial counsel shall also state whether he was aware that Applicant was suffering from mental health
    issues at the time he committed these offenses, and if so whether counsel requested that Applicant
    be evaluated for sanity at the time of the offenses or competency to stand trial. The trial court may
    use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial
    court may rely on its personal recollection. 
    Id. If the
    trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s
    claims that his plea agreement was breached and that his mental health issues were not considered
    or addressed prior to the plea. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and
    conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
    habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
    3
    be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: November 19, 2014
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-82,318-01

Filed Date: 11/19/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015