Gray, Ronald AKA Grey, Ronald ( 2014 )


Menu:









  • IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

    OF TEXAS  




      NO. WR-22,442-05



     


    EX PARTE RONALD GRAY, Applicant





    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

    CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-07-202476-B IN THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT

    FROM TRAVIS COUNTY



     


                Per curiam.

     

    O R D E R


                Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Gray v. State, No. 03-08-00355-CR (Tex. App.—Austin 2009, pet. ref’d).

                Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to request an instruction on attempted aggravated assault and to investigate and present mitigation evidence.

                Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

                If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

                The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s conduct was deficient and, if so, Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

                This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


    Filed: May 21, 2014

    Do not publish