Smith v. State , 1976 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1091 ( 1976 )


Menu:
  • OPINION

    DALLY, Commissioner.

    These are appeals from final judgments forfeiting appearance bonds.

    The appellant, a surety on the bonds, asserts there is insufficient evidence to support the judgment because the judgments nisi were not admitted in evidence. A final judgment forfeiting a bail bond must be supported by the judgment nisi. Fears v. State, 500 S.W.2d 815 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Purkey v. State, 494 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Morgan v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 117, 247 S.W.2d 94 (1952). The State did not offer in evidence the judgments nisi; the State concedes error.

    The judgments are reversed and the causes are remanded.

    Opinion approved by the Court.

Document Info

Docket Number: Nos. 52665-52667

Citation Numbers: 542 S.W.2d 150, 1976 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1091

Judges: Dally

Filed Date: 10/13/1976

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024