Weatherly, Rohn M. ( 2019 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-61,215-07
EX PARTE ROHN M. WEATHERLY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. C-371-011129-1380491-B IN THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT
FROM TARRANT COUNTY
Per curiam. KEASLER , J., concurred. YEARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion.
SLAUGHTER , J., dissented.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful restraint
and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.
Weatherly v. State, No. 02-16-00027-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 8, 2016) (not designated for
publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that after he was convicted and sentenced, the trial
court entered a judgment nunc pro tunc, rendering his plea involuntary. We remanded this
2
application and ordered the trial court to determine whether Applicant received timely notice of the
trial court’s intent to enter a judgment nunc pro tunc. See Shaw v. State, 539 S.W.2d 887, 890 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1976) (“Before any unfavorable nunc pro tunc orders are entered the person convicted
should be given an opportunity to be present for the hearing, represented by counsel, in order to
accord him due process of law.”).
On remand, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, determined that the
trial court failed to provide notice to Applicant before it entered the judgment nunc pro tunc, and
recommended that we deny this application.
We find that entry of the July 18, 2017 judgment nunc pro tunc violated Applicant’s due
process rights. Relief is granted. Findings in the July 18, 2017 judgment nunc pro tunc that sex
offender registration requirements do apply and that the complainant was younger than 17 years of
age shall be deleted. The trial court is free to enter a judgment nunc pro tunc if warranted and if the
trial court follows the proper procedures.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Filed: September 11, 2019
Do not publish