Strickland, Charles Lee ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •               IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-26,945-05
    EX PARTE CHARLES LEE STRICKLAND, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 90-CR-00000202-B IN THE 138TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM CAMERON COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    OPINION
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to robbery and was
    sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
    Applicant contends, among other things, that the trial court’s order that this sentence run
    consecutively with his sentence in another case was improper because the plea agreement the other
    case called for his sentence to run concurrently with sentences arising from other cases pending at
    the D.A.’s office “involving aggravated robbery and kidnapping.” Applicant also alleges that the
    2
    trial court did not order the sentences to be cumulated when the sentence was pronounced, but added
    the cumulation order on the written judgment. Applicant alleges that neither he nor TDCJ was aware
    that his sentences were supposed to be cumulated until 2013, when the cumulation order was
    “discovered” in the written judgment. Applicant alleges that he never received a copy of the written
    judgment containing the cumulation order, was not present at the time it was signed, and was not
    aware that his sentences were cumulated until 2013, and therefore could not have objected or sought
    relief before that time. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and
    conclusions of law.
    The trial court finds that this case was pending in the District Attorney’s Office when
    Applicant entered his plea in the other case, and recommends that relief be granted and that the
    judgments be ordered to run concurrently.
    Relief is granted. The cumulation order entered in the judgment in Cause No. 90-CR-202-B
    in the 138th District Court of Cameron County is hereby deleted, and Applicant’s sentence is ordered
    to run concurrently with his sentence in Cause No. 89-CR-1284-A.
    Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
    Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
    Delivered: June 8, 2016
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-26,945-05

Filed Date: 6/8/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/13/2016