Grant, Jermaine Andre ( 2016 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-84,085-03
EX PARTE JERMAINE ANDRE GRANT, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 1016934-A IN THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam. ALCALA , J., filed a concurring opinion in which JOHNSON , J., joined.
YEARY , J., filed a concurring opinion in which KEASLER and HERVEY , JJ., joined.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
robbery and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Grant v. State, 218 S.W.3d 225 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2007).
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel failed to object to an in-court
identification that was tainted by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
2
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to the above claim. The trial court may use any means set out
in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its
personal recollection. Id.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions
of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court
shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and
appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: June 29, 2016
Do not publish