Salinas, Orlando ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •           IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. PD-0170-16
    ORLANDO SALINAS, Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
    FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    HARRIS COUNTY
    H ERVEY, J., filed a concurring opinion.
    CONCURRING OPINION
    I agree with the majority’s disposition of this case and join its opinion, but I write
    separately to address two issues.
    First, although the majority correctly addresses only the $133 consolidated court-
    cost fee because that is the only one at issue in this case, there are other consolidated
    court costs that are also affected by this Court’s opinion. In fact, a consolidated court cost
    is assessed against anyone convicted of any criminal offense except pedestrian or
    Salinas–2
    parking-of-a-motor-vehicle offenses. T EX. L OC. G OV’T C ODE § 133.102(a). The following
    table should elucidate the changes:
    Consolidated Fees on Conviction
    Before Salinas                    Post-Salinas
    Felony                                     $133.00                         $119.93
    Class A & B misdemeanors                   $83.00                           $74.84
    Nonjailable offenses,                      $40.00                           $36.07
    including a criminal
    violation of a municipal
    ordinance, other than a
    pedestrian or parking-of-a-
    motor-vehicle offense
    
    Id. Second, there
    are 254 counties in the State of Texas, and many of those counties
    have more than one clerk:1 district court clerks, county court clerks, justice court clerks,
    and municipal court clerks . Those clerks, in turn, often have their own staff carrying out
    their daily duties. Our holding today affects all of them. And, although defense attorneys,
    county attorneys, and district attorneys are familiar with this Court’s opinions, I am not so
    sure that the hard-working clerks of this State have the time to read every opinion handed
    down by this Court. So to ensure clerks begin assessing the correct costs as soon as
    possible and that people pay only what they are required to, I would order the clerk of this
    1
    In rural counties with a population less than 8,000, the office of district clerk is
    combined with the county clerk unless the voters authorize separate offices. TEX . GOV ’T CODE
    § 51.501.
    Salinas–3
    Court to send copies of this decision to the County & District Clerk Association of Texas,
    the Justices of the Peace and Constables Association, and the Texas Municipal Courts
    Association to be disseminated amongst their membership. We may not be able to notify
    every clerk in the State about this decision, but we should take any reasonable measures
    we can to do so.
    Filed: March 8, 2017
    Publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: PD-0170-16

Filed Date: 3/8/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/13/2017