Lozano, Marco Antonio ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-93,970-01
    EX PARTE MARCO ANTONIO LOZANO, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. DC78-CR2019-0167*1 IN THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM WICHITA COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance and was placed on deferred
    adjudication probation. Following the State’s motion to proceed with adjudication of guilt, alleging
    that Applicant had violated his probation conditions. The trial court found a number of those
    allegations true, adjudicated Applicant guilty, and sentenced Applicant to eighteen months’
    imprisonment in state jail. Applicant did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this application
    for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this
    Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
    Applicant contends, among other things, that adjudication counsel was ineffective for failing
    to request a competency evaluation, present mitigating evidence at sentencing, and file a notice of
    2
    appeal. Applicant also alleges that he is incompetent and was incompetent when he pleaded guilty
    and when his guilt was adjudicated. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to
    relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 
    474 U.S. 52
     (1985); Ex parte Argent, 
    393 S.W.3d 781
     (Tex. Crim. App.
    2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for
    findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order both plea
    counsel and adjudication counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the
    trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a
    hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be
    represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX .
    CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately
    notify this Court of counsel’s name.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether adjudication
    counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make
    specific findings as to whether Applicant was incompetent when he pleaded guilty and when his guilt
    was adjudicated. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
    appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
    the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
    findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
    affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
    hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
    by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
    3
    Filed:           November 02, 2022
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-93,970-01

Filed Date: 11/2/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2022