Sandoval, Gustavo Tijerina ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. AP-77,081
    GUSTAVO TIJERINA SANDOVAL, Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    ON DIRECT APPEAL
    FROM CAUSE NO. 2015-DCR-02443-C IN THE 197TH DISTRICT COURT
    CAMERON COUNTY
    ORDER
    Per curiam.
    We remanded this case to the trial court to make written findings on the voluntariness of
    recorded statements pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.22 and to hold a hearing and
    make findings on a jury-selection issue.1 The trial court has satisfactorily complied with the jury-
    selection portion of our remand order but has not made Article 38.22 findings. At the remand
    1
    Sandoval v. State, No. AP-77,081, 
    2022 Tex. Crim. App. Unpub. LEXIS 114
     (Tex. Crim.
    App. Mar 2, 2022) (not designated for publication).
    SANDOVAL ORDER — 2
    hearing, questions were raised about whether Judge Migdalia Lopez, who presided over the
    suppression hearing, or the current judge should make findings, whether the current judge was
    required to make findings if Judge Lopez was unavailable, and whether a new hearing on the motion
    to suppress was authorized by our remand order.
    We again remand this case to the trial court. The trial court will first determine whether
    Judge Lopez is eligible to be assigned to make the Article 38.22 findings. If the trial court
    determines that she is eligible, it must attempt to secure her assignment to make those findings. If
    the trial court finds that Judge Lopez is ineligible or otherwise unavailable, the trial court must make
    findings on why that is so. If it is determined that Judge Lopez cannot make findings, the trial court
    will make Article 38.22 findings on the basis of the record of the suppression hearing. No hearing
    is authorized with respect to Article 38.22 findings themselves, but the trial court is free to hold a
    hearing regarding the eligibility or availability of Judge Lopez.
    The Article 38.22 findings are due 60 days from the date of this order. If the trial court
    determines that Judge Lopez is ineligible or unavailable to make findings, the trial court’s findings
    on that determination are due within 20 days from the date of this order.
    Filed: July 27, 2022
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-77,081

Filed Date: 7/27/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2022