Steadman v. State , 146 Tex. Crim. 512 ( 1943 )

In his motion for rehearing, appellant for the first time attacks the sufficiency of the indictment to support the conviction.

The indictment follows substantially that which has been approved by this Court. Simmons v. State, 169 S.W.2d 171; Houston v. State, 158 S.W.2d 1004, 143 Tex.Crim. R..

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.