Everett v. State ( 1929 )

Appellant predicates a motion for rehearing upon the contention that the indictment is duplicitous, thereby for the first time raising such question. We see no defect in the indictment in the particular mentioned. Even if it were vulnerable to such attack it comes too late after verdict. Melley v. State, 93 Tex.Crim. Rep., 248 S.W. 367; Garner v. State, 100 Tex.Crim. Rep., 272 S.W. 167; Ramsey v. State, 108 Tex.Crim. Rep., 299 S.W. 411.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Overruled.