Mitchell, Otis Samuel ( 2020 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-91,412-01
EX PARTE OTIS SAMUEL MITCHELL, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 13-10-11074(1) IN THE 359TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of
aggravated kidnapping. He was sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment for the aggravated sexual
assault counts and twenty-five years’ imprisonment for the aggravated kidnapping count. The Ninth
Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Mitchell v. State, Nos. 09-15-00162-CR, 09-15-00164-
CR & 09-15-00164-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont May 4, 2016) (not designated for publication).
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district
clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his conviction
had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Based
2
on the record, the trial court has determined that appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and
that Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for counsel’s deficient
performance.
Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,
180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for discretionary
review of the judgments of the Ninth Court of Appeals in cause numbers 09-15-00162, 09-15-00163-
CR, and 09-15-00164-CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he
must file it with this Court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
Delivered: August 19, 2020
Do not publish