Weems, Ruthen James ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-87,085-03
    EX PARTE RUTHEN JAMES WEEMS, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 2015-229-C2C IN THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM MCLENNAN COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Applicant was convicted of one count of aggravated assault and one count of unlawful
    possession of a firearm and sentenced to life and ten years’ imprisonment respectively. The Tenth
    Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions.       Weems v. State, No. 10-17-00404-CR (Tex.
    App.—Waco April 10, 2019)(not designated for publication).
    The Court received this writ application on January 13, 2020. On February 26, 2020,
    this Court dismissed it as subsequent. T EX. C ODE C RIM. P RO. Art. 11.07, sec. 4. However,
    it has now come to the Court’s attention that Applicant’s prior habeas application should
    have been dismissed, not denied. Due to that error, this application would no longer be
    2
    considered subsequent and should be addressed on the merits. Accordingly, the Court
    withdraws its prior ruling which dismissed this application without written order, reopens the
    application, and enters this order remanding the application.
    Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective in sixteen different
    grounds.    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.
    Washington, 
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is
    the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court
    shall order trial counsel to respond to all of Applicant’s claims of ineffective counsel. In developing
    the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects
    to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and
    wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent at the hearing.
    See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall
    immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
    performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other
    findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s. The trial court shall
    also make a ruling on Applicant’s request to exceed the page limits for his memorandum of law.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
    the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
    findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
    affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
    hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
    3
    by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
    Filed: April 29, 2020
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-87,085-03

Filed Date: 4/29/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/30/2020