Ramirez, Gregorio ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-91,175-01
    EX PARTE GREGORIO RAMIREZ, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 2016-DCR-00550-E IN THE 357TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM CAMERON COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Applicant was convicted of one count of murder and one count of arson and sentenced to
    forty years’ imprisonment for the murder charge and twenty years’ imprisonment for the arson
    charge, to run concurrently. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Ramirez v.
    State, No. 13-17-00173-CR (Tex. App. — Corpus Christi - Edinburg Aug. 9, 2018) (not designated
    for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of
    conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
    Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to interview or
    obtain a statement and testimony from Applicant’s girlfriend, Mayra Camaro to support Applicant’s
    claim that he acted in self-defense, and failed to request a jury instruction on defense of another.
    2
    Applicant also alleges that counsel (who also represented Applicant on direct appeal) was ineffective
    for failing to argue that Applicant was entitled to a new trial because the trial court’s findings of fact
    as to one of the defense’s pre-trial motions to suppress were missing from the record and were
    necessary to the resolution of Applicant’s appellate claims.
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
    
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate
    forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial
    counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use any
    means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
    whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the
    trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
    26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of
    counsel’s name.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
    performance was deficient at trial and on direct appeal, and as to whether Applicant was prejudiced.
    The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response
    to Applicant’s claims.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
    the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
    findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
    affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
    hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
    3
    by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
    Filed: April 29, 2020
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-91,175-01

Filed Date: 4/29/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/30/2020