Pantoja, Carlos ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NOS. WR-86,535-01 & 86,535-02
    EX PARTE CARLOS PANTOJA, Applicant
    ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NOS. D-1-DC-07-300101-A & D-1-DC-07-300047-A
    IN THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
    parte Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of five counts
    of aggravated robbery and sentenced to imprisonment for five, ten, twelve, and two terms of eighteen
    years. He did not appeal his convictions.
    Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Applicant has alleged
    facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984); Ex parte
    Patterson, 
    993 S.W.2d 114
    , 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts
    2
    are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the
    trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to
    respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. The trial court may use any means
    set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s
    conduct was deficient and, but for counsel’s alleged deficient conduct, Applicant would not have
    pleaded guilty but instead insisted on a trial. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact
    and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims
    for habeas corpus relief.
    These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
    The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
    be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: April 5, 2017
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-86,535-02

Filed Date: 4/5/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/10/2017