RANSIER, CHARLES ROBERT v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •             IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. PD-0289-20
    CHARLES ROBERT RANSIER, Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    ON STATE=S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
    FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    COMAL COUNTY
    KEEL, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined.
    CONCURRING OPINION
    I agree with the majority; Appellant was not entitled to an instruction on attempted
    tampering by concealment because, while there was testimony both that he concealed the
    syringe and tried to conceal it, there was no evidence that he only tried to conceal it.
    And I appreciate and endorse the majority’s narrowing of Bullock v. State, 
    509 S.W.3d 921
     (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). But our caselaw on requiring lesser-included-offense
    instructions on defense request is still muddled, and I would like to clear it up more
    Ransier – Page 2
    definitively. See Chavez v. State, 
    666 S.W.3d 772
    , 782 (Tex. Crim. App. 2022) (Keel,
    J., concurring). Maybe someday we will. In the meantime, I join the majority’s step in
    that direction.
    Delivered: June 28, 2023
    Publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: PD-0289-20

Filed Date: 6/28/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/3/2023