Tyeskie, Cabien Keshane ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-94,838-01
    EX PARTE CABIEN KESHANE TYESKIE, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 50975-B-H-1 IN THE 124TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM GREGG COUNTY
    Per curiam. YEARY , J., concurred.
    OPINION
    Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment.
    His direct appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction because notice of appeal was not timely
    filed. Tyeskie v. State, No. 06-22-00118-CR (tex. App. — Texarkana October 20, 2022) (not
    designated for publication). He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of
    conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
    Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal because counsel failed to timely
    file his motion for new trial and notice of appeal. This Court has consistently held that it is trial
    counsel’s responsibility to file notice of appeal if the defendant indicates a desire to appeal. Jones
    v. State, 
    98 S.W.3d 700
    , 703 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). However, in this case the trial court
    2
    apparently appointed appellate counsel on the same day Applicant was sentenced, without insuring
    that a motion for new trial or notice of appeal had been filed. Appointed appellate counsel learned
    that Applicant had retained appellate counsel, and filed a motion to withdraw from the representation
    within the thirty-day period for filing notice of appeal, but the trial court did not grant the motion to
    withdraw until after the thirty-day period had elapsed. Retained appellate counsel filed an untimely
    motion for a new trial and notice of appeal after appointed appellate counsel had filed the motion
    to withdraw, after the thirty-day deadline had passed, but before the trial court granted the motion
    to withdraw.
    It appears that Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal on the basis of a “breakdown in
    the system.” Relief is granted. Ex parte Riley, 
    193 S.W.3d 900
     (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Applicant
    may file an out-of-time appeal of his conviction in cause number 50975-B from the 124th District
    Court of Gregg County. Within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall
    determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by
    counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him on direct appeal. Should Applicant
    decide to appeal, he must file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within thirty days from the
    date of this Court’s mandate.
    Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
    Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
    Delivered: June 7, 2023
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-94,838-01

Filed Date: 6/7/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/12/2023