Bilali v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    *************************
    ADEM BILALI, an infant by his mother *
    and natural guardian, KARINA TORRES, *
    *                      No. 13-716V
    Petitioner,    *                      Special Master Christian J. Moran
    *
    v.                                   *
    *                      Filed: November 12, 2014
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                  *
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                  *                      Dismissal; Hepatitis B;
    Respondent.    *                      Pneumococcal vaccines.
    *************************
    Craig A. Post, Barr & Haas, Spring Valley, NY for petitioner.
    Alexis B. Babcock, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
    UNPUBLISHED DECISION DENYING COMPENSATION 1
    Karina Torres filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,
    42 U.S.C. §300aa—10 et seq., on behalf of Adem Bilali on September 23, 2013. Her
    petition alleged that her minor child, Adem, suffered an adverse reaction, as a result of
    the hepatitis B and pneumococcal vaccinations received on April 27, 2011. The
    information in the record, however, does not show entitlement to an award under the
    Program.
    I.   Procedural History
    On September 23, 2013, Ms. Torres, on behalf of her minor child, Adem Bilali,
    filed a petition alleging that Adem’s injuries were caused in fact by the pneumococcal
    and hepatitis B vaccines he received on August 27, 2011. No medical records were filed
    with the petition as required by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—11(c).
    On October 31, 2013, a status conference was held. During the status conference,
    the parties discussed petitioner’s medical records and petitioner’s expert report. The
    1
    The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    , 2913 (Dec. 17,
    2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),
    the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other
    information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special
    master will appear in the document posted on the website.
    undersigned advised the petitioner to file a supplemental expert report. Respondent noted
    the previous case law in regards to seizures disorders and SCN1A gene mutations.
    Petitioner continued to postpone the filing of their outstanding medical records.
    On April 25, 2014, Petitioner’s counsel moved for a 30 day suspension because of
    the review of recent Federal Circuit decisions. The undersigned granted the stay and
    scheduled another status conference.
    On October 21, 2014, Ms. Torres on behalf of Adem, moved for a decision
    dismissing her petition. They noted that “[a]n investigation of the facts and science
    supporting their case has demonstrated . . . that they will be unable to prove that they are
    entitled to compensation.” Mot. for a Decision Dismissing Petition at ¶ 1.
    II.   Analysis
    To receive compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
    Program, petitioners must prove either 1) that the vaccinee suffered a “Table Injury” –
    i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table – corresponding to one of the
    vaccinee’s vaccinations, or 2) that the vaccinee suffered an injury that was actually
    caused by a vaccine. See §§ 300aa—13(a)(1)(A) and 300aa—11(c)(1). An examination
    of the record did not uncover any evidence that Adem suffered a “Table Injury.” Further,
    the record does not contain a medical expert’s opinion or any other persuasive evidence
    indicating that Adem’s injuries were vaccine-caused.
    Under the Act, petitioners may not be given a Program award based solely on the
    petitioners’ claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by either medical
    records or by the opinion of a competent physician. § 300aa—13(a)(1). In this case,
    because the medical records do not support Ms. Torres’ claim, a medical opinion must be
    offered in support. Ms. Torres’ expert opinion was not sufficient. Accordingly, it is clear
    from the record in this case that she has failed to demonstrate either that Adem suffered a
    “Table Injury” or that Adem’s injuries were “actually caused” by a vaccination.
    Thus, this case is dismissed for insufficient proof. The Clerk shall enter
    judgment accordingly.
    Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Christina Gervasi, at (202) 357-
    6521.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Christian J. Moran
    Christian J. Moran
    Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-716

Judges: Christian J. Moran

Filed Date: 12/9/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021