Pittaluga v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •              In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 14-472V
    Filed: November 24, 2014
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *               *
    ALISA PITTALUGA, mother of                *               UNPUBLISHED
    D.P., a minor,                            *               Special Master Dorsey
    *
    Petitioner,                 *
    *
    v.                                        *
    *               Decision on Proffer; Damages;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                       *               Table Injury; Measles-Mumps-
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                       *               Rubella (MMR) Vaccine;
    *               Thrombocytopenic Purpura.
    Respondent.                 *
    *
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.
    Gordon Elliot Shemin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On June 4, 2014, Alisa Pittaluga (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation pursuant
    to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program2, on behalf of her child, D.P. 42 U.S.C.
    §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that D.P received the measles-mumps rubella
    (MMR) vaccine on August 15, 2011, and thereafter suffered thrombocytopenic purpura. See
    Petition at 1.
    1
    Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
    the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
    Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    , 2913 (codified as amended at 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2006)). As provided by
    Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
    information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
    substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
    disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
    18(b).
    2
    The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
    Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    , codified as amended,
    42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
    individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
    On August 29, 2014, respondent filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) conceding
    that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Report at 3-5. Specifically,
    respondent agreed that the medical records satisfy the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury
    Table and accompanying QAI for demonstrating a presumptively vaccine-related
    thrombocytopenic purpura. Id. at 4.
    On November 24, 2014, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation
    (“Proffer”). In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered
    award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an
    award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer (Appendix A), the undersigned awards
    petitioner:
    (1)     A lump sum of $685.23, in the form of a check payable to petitioner Alisa
    Pittaluga; and
    (2)     A lump sum payment of $50,000.00, in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner Alisa Pittaluga as the guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate.
    Respondent states that no payments shall be made until petitioner provides
    respondent with documentation establishing she has been appointed as the
    guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate. This amount accounts for all elements of
    compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner would be
    entitled.
    Proffer ¶ II.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
    the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/ Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
    notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    ALISA PITTALUGA, mother of            )
    D.P., a minor,                        )
    )
    Petitioner,            )    No. 14-472V
    )    Special Master Dorsey
    v.                            )    ECF
    )
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND               )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                       )
    )
    Respondent.            )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.     Items of Compensation
    For purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in Respondent’s
    Rule 4(c) Report, filed on August 29, 2014 conceding entitlement in this case. Based upon the
    evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $50,685.23, consisting
    of $685.23 in past unreimbursable expenses and $50,000.00 in pain and suffering. This
    represents all elements of competition to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa-15(a) for D.P.’s vaccine-related injury. Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through two lump sum payments described below, and request that the Special Master’s decision
    and the Court’s judgment award the following:
    A.      A lump sum of $685.23 in the form of a check payable to petitioner Alisa
    Pittaluga; and
    B.      A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner Alisa
    Pittaluga as the guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate.
    1.      Guardianship
    No payments shall be made pursuant to paragraph B until petitioner provides
    respondent with documentation establishing that she has been appointed as the
    guardian/conservator of D.P.’s estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent
    jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the estate of D.P., any such payment shall be
    made to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as
    guardian/conservator of the estate of D.P. upon submission of written documentation of such
    appointment to the Secretary.
    III.   Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    A.     Lump sum paid to petitioner:                                 $685.23
    B.     Lump sum paid to petitioner as the guardian/conservator
    of D.P.’s estate:                                            $50,000.00
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOYCE R. BRANDA
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
    Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    LYNN E. RICCIARDELLA
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    2
    /s/ Gordon Shemin
    GORDON SHEMIN
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Telephone: (202) 616-4208
    Dated: November 24, 2014       Fax: (202) 353-2988
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-472

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 12/15/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021