Marshall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1203V
    UNPUBLISHED
    KYRIAN J. MARSHALL,                                        Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                         Filed: December 22, 2021
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                            Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    Table Injury; Influenza (Flu);
    Respondent.                            Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (SIRVA).
    Kathy Ann Lee, Christie Farrell Lee & Bell, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, for Petitioner.
    Zoe Wade, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    On September 15, 2020, Kyrian J. Marshall filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on
    October 17, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of
    the Office of Special Masters.
    On December 21, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he
    concedes that Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the
    Vaccine Injury Table, and that compensation is appropriate. Specifically, Petitioner had
    no recent history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her right shoulder; the onset of
    1
    Because this unpublished opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the opinion will be available to anyone with access to the internet.
    In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or
    other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon
    review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public
    access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    Petitioner’s pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination;
    Petitioner’s pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and
    no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain Petitioner’s right shoulder
    symptoms. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner met the statutory requirements by
    suffering the condition for more than six months. Rule 4(c) Report (ECF No. 30) at 1, 7-8
    (citing 
    42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3
    (a), (c)(10)).
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1203

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 1/24/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/25/2022